Dear reader,
I write the following as a film fan and yet in the
belief that it is true. It's true that actors, as much as we like
them or their role or the film: for them it's only a job. I have read
from several actors that they have been approached by fans on the
street saying keywords, which to fans are quite significant to a role
they once played. At that moment it doesn't occur to us fans that the
actors only learn their lines, film it and then walk on to the next
role, the next lines. In fact there are a few actors who out of
principle don't watch any films they're in. They haven't seen the
film for the umpteenth time like we have. Someone once said
that some fans know some of his lines better than the actor who said
it did.
From several interviews with Benedict Cumberbatch I
know that the role of Sherlock Holmes is a lot of fun to play for
him. Especially learning the deductions and talking that fast when he
speaks them. One wrong word or one wrong intonation and the whole
deduction is messed up. And yet it's only a job. Benedict Cumberbatch
is not Sherlock Holmes. Benedict Cumberbatch is Benedict Cumberbatch.
Some years back I read that Robbie Coltrane, who
played Hagrid in the Harry Potter films, said in an interview words
to the effect of: when the money is right, he'd play anything. The
Hagrid actor would play anything for the right money?! And he's the
one playing one of Harry Potter's best friends?! What a stupid actor
for such a role! And yet it's only a job. Robbie Coltrane is not
Hagrid. Robbie Coltrane is Robbie Coltrane.
In the film “State of Grace” Gary Oldman plays
the younger brother of Ed Harris. Like probably many other Gary
Oldman fans I rued the scene in which Ed Harris shot Gary Oldman to
death in that film. Gary Oldman's character was somehow very likeable
and didn't deserve dying that way. I needed a few weeks to calm down
and not being angry with Ed Harris. Yes, I was angry with Ed Harris.
I respect him as an actor and thought it stupid that he'd play such a
role in which he'd kill another actor I like. But he only played a
role and most of all only went with what the script said. I didn't
think of being angry with the script writer. No. Instead I refused to
watch any film with Ed Harris in it for weeks. And yet it's only a
job. Ed Harris is not Frankie Flannery. Ed Harris is Ed Harris.
Christopher Eccleston only had one season of playing the Doctor. He didn't want to be stereo-typed and only be seen as the Doctor with roles similar to that of the Doctor. I hardly know him and can't say how great that “danger” really was. I liked what I've seen from him as the Doctor and in other films, too. When David Tennant got offered the role of the Doctor, he thought a long time whether he should accept it or not. He was and still is a big “Doctor Who” fan, but what if fans didn't like him? Or what if he would only be seen as “the Doctor”? And yet it's only a job. Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant are not the Doctor. Christopher Eccleston is Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant is David Tennant.
Until next blog,
sarah
This reminder is so important - it's unfortunate that many of us begin to think of the actors *as* our characters. While they may become those characters for a time, it is not a representation of who they are.
ReplyDeleteThe exception, I will say, is with The Doctor, *particularly* in Matt Smith's case. That role is so well-loved and iconic across the world that I think in these latest years, the actor has truly become the character. They are allowed to put so much of themselves into the role, and the role truly changes who they are. Those final words from Matt Smith in his time as the Doctor - "I'll always remember when the Doctor was me" - those were his words, and so much more than a simple character.