Dear reader,
for all of you, who enjoy to drink tea or are interested in tea, I've got this month's documentation:
"Victoria Wood's Nice Cup of Tea" is a BBC production produced in april 2013. In this two part program Victoria Wood follows up the history of tea and why the british love tea so much. The first part is about how tea, which originally came from china, came to great britain. The british eventually wanted to be independant from the chinese. India seemed a good enough substitute, especially since india was a former british colony. But what could the british have to trade with the indian? The answer to that question surprised me a lot and I wasn't expecting it at all.
The second part deals with why tea means so much for the british. Victoria Woods speaks with construction side workers, taxi drivers, the actor Matt Smith (known as the 11th Doctor of "Doctor Who"). Tea helped the british win the war, according to some discussion partners. Towards the end of the second part of this documentary Victoria Wood asks the question, if tea has a future at all, with Starbucks and all the sorts of coffee and coffee mixes. Does tea have a future? What could be the future of tea? By the way also worth a thought why in english they talk about a "nice cup of tea" so often. Why "nice"?
Youtube has got both parts online, at least for now. Here are the links:
part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOwWTFh_y9E (59 minutes)
part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4I47_vXBtU (58:44 minutes)
Until next blog,
sarah
Friday, 28 February 2014
Thursday, 27 February 2014
Better be born in a different time?
Dear reader,
from "Sherlock" to "Elementary". Even though I didn't quite like the ending of the first season of "Elementary" that much - apart from the very last scene (bees!) - I did go on watching the second season, as soon as the internet allowed me to. In the 7th episode Sherlock goes to a sobriety meeting. The leader has a question to close the meeting of the day and surprisingly enough Sherlock is the first to say something. It's about crazy thoughts about their disease. Thoughts they know are crazy, but still come up.
Sherlock: "I often wonder if I should have been born in another time." And he goes on in a striking open way, " My senses are unusually-- well, one could even say unnaturally-- keen. And ours is an era of distraction. It's a punishing drumbeat of constant input. This cacophony which follows us into our homes and into our beds and seeps into our souls, for want of a better word. For a long time there was only one poultice for my raw nerve endings, and that was, copious drug use. So in my less prooductive moments, I'm given to wonder if I'd just been born when it was a little quieter out there, would I have even become an addict in the first place? Might I have been more focused? A more fully realized person?"
Someone asks Sherlock, "What, like Ancient Greece?"
Sherlock: "You any idea what passed for dental care in the Hellenic era? No, I'd want some of the wonders of modernity. Just before everything got amplified."
The discussion is interrupted by Sherlock's brother Mycroft, revealing himself with a question. Sherlock is shocked and leaves. Not only Sherlock with his unusual perception is stressed. We mortals are ever more stressed as well and everything around us gets faster and noisier and bigger and brighter. Type into a google images search the words: earth by night. That's how bright the earth is even by night. Does it all have to be that way?
Until next blog,
sarah
from "Sherlock" to "Elementary". Even though I didn't quite like the ending of the first season of "Elementary" that much - apart from the very last scene (bees!) - I did go on watching the second season, as soon as the internet allowed me to. In the 7th episode Sherlock goes to a sobriety meeting. The leader has a question to close the meeting of the day and surprisingly enough Sherlock is the first to say something. It's about crazy thoughts about their disease. Thoughts they know are crazy, but still come up.
Sherlock: "I often wonder if I should have been born in another time." And he goes on in a striking open way, " My senses are unusually-- well, one could even say unnaturally-- keen. And ours is an era of distraction. It's a punishing drumbeat of constant input. This cacophony which follows us into our homes and into our beds and seeps into our souls, for want of a better word. For a long time there was only one poultice for my raw nerve endings, and that was, copious drug use. So in my less prooductive moments, I'm given to wonder if I'd just been born when it was a little quieter out there, would I have even become an addict in the first place? Might I have been more focused? A more fully realized person?"
Someone asks Sherlock, "What, like Ancient Greece?"
Sherlock: "You any idea what passed for dental care in the Hellenic era? No, I'd want some of the wonders of modernity. Just before everything got amplified."
The discussion is interrupted by Sherlock's brother Mycroft, revealing himself with a question. Sherlock is shocked and leaves. Not only Sherlock with his unusual perception is stressed. We mortals are ever more stressed as well and everything around us gets faster and noisier and bigger and brighter. Type into a google images search the words: earth by night. That's how bright the earth is even by night. Does it all have to be that way?
Until next blog,
sarah
Wednesday, 26 February 2014
Am I pretty?
Dear reader,
Sherlock Holmes can sometimes get on people's nerves a lot with his analytic ways. Or when he doesn't want to admit that he doesn't have a clue. In "The Sign of Three" (The 2nd episode of the 3rd season of "Sherlock") quite certainly both apply. Sherlock and John are both drunk for John's stag night and play "Who Am I?" For that you get a piece of paper stuck to your forehead and have to guess the name on it. Usually a quite entertaining game. Though probably not with Sherlock. John should have known by now that Sherlock is not the man for trivia and chitchat and doesn't care about what would commonly be considered famous or interesting people.
John: "Am I pretty? This." (John points to the paper on his forehead)
Sherlock: "Beauty is a construct based entirely on childhood impressions, influences and role models."
John: "Yeah, but am I a pretty lady?"
Sherlock: "I don't know who you are, I don't know who you're supposed to be."
John: "You picked the name!"
Sherlock: "But I picked it at random from the papers."
John: "You're not really getting the hang of this game, are you, Sherlock?"
Sherlock is right with his argument though. It's exactly the factors Sherlock lists and more, which make us divide unknown people into nice or unlikeable, intelligent or stupid or any of the other many other pigeon-holes we have. A totally normal reaction. Routine and familiar situations, things and people are what help us making our life easier. We could not constantly react to each situation as if it was totally new to us. Something like real objectivity doesn't exist.
Even Sherlock Holmes' way of thinking is nevertheless not impeccable though. In "The Great Game" (season 1, episode 3 of "Sherlock") John can't believe it at first that Sherlock doesn't know the earth goes around the sun. Detective Inspector Lestrade and other police men also make fun of that. Sherlock doesn't care. His head is important to him and the fact that the earth goes around the sun is not important enough for him to keep it in mind for long. Though at the end of the episode even Sherlock has to admit that a little more knowledge about the solar system would have helped him solve the case faster.
Until next blog,
sarah
Sherlock Holmes can sometimes get on people's nerves a lot with his analytic ways. Or when he doesn't want to admit that he doesn't have a clue. In "The Sign of Three" (The 2nd episode of the 3rd season of "Sherlock") quite certainly both apply. Sherlock and John are both drunk for John's stag night and play "Who Am I?" For that you get a piece of paper stuck to your forehead and have to guess the name on it. Usually a quite entertaining game. Though probably not with Sherlock. John should have known by now that Sherlock is not the man for trivia and chitchat and doesn't care about what would commonly be considered famous or interesting people.
John: "Am I pretty? This." (John points to the paper on his forehead)
Sherlock: "Beauty is a construct based entirely on childhood impressions, influences and role models."
John: "Yeah, but am I a pretty lady?"
Sherlock: "I don't know who you are, I don't know who you're supposed to be."
John: "You picked the name!"
Sherlock: "But I picked it at random from the papers."
John: "You're not really getting the hang of this game, are you, Sherlock?"
Sherlock is right with his argument though. It's exactly the factors Sherlock lists and more, which make us divide unknown people into nice or unlikeable, intelligent or stupid or any of the other many other pigeon-holes we have. A totally normal reaction. Routine and familiar situations, things and people are what help us making our life easier. We could not constantly react to each situation as if it was totally new to us. Something like real objectivity doesn't exist.
Even Sherlock Holmes' way of thinking is nevertheless not impeccable though. In "The Great Game" (season 1, episode 3 of "Sherlock") John can't believe it at first that Sherlock doesn't know the earth goes around the sun. Detective Inspector Lestrade and other police men also make fun of that. Sherlock doesn't care. His head is important to him and the fact that the earth goes around the sun is not important enough for him to keep it in mind for long. Though at the end of the episode even Sherlock has to admit that a little more knowledge about the solar system would have helped him solve the case faster.
Until next blog,
sarah
Labels:
Dr. John Watson,
psychology,
Sherlock,
Sherlock Holmes
Friday, 31 January 2014
M&M: Gun Shy
Dear reader,
Until next blog,
sarah
in 2000 the actor Liam Neeson had the leading role as
the DEA agent Charlie in the film „Gun Shy“. Charlie comes back
from an undercover mission, which has gone horribly wrong. It ended
in a disastrous shooting, in which Charlie's colleague got killed and
almost got him killed as well. Instead Charlie ended up head first in
a water melon. Needless to say that he hates melons since then. From
that moment on he has severe digestive problems as well as anxiety.
There's nothing he wants more than retirement and the view of the
ocean.
On his flight back, Charlie meets the therapist Dr.
Jeff Bleckner (Michael Mantell). He notices how uncomfortable Charlie
is and offers him help. Dr. Bleckner suggests Charlie goes to do some
group therapy. During those sessions Charlie finds out that he's far
from being the only one unhappy with his (professional) life. As he
tells the others about his problems, he falls on sympathetic ears.
Charlie has to take on one last job to stop the scary mafia
boss Fulvio and his money laundering business. Charlie is so nervous
meeting Fulvio the first time, that Dr. Bleckner prescribes him some
pills. The therapist makes it very clear to Charlie only to take one
pill. But Charlie is so nervous and the effect doesn't come fast
enough for Charlie. So he takes a second. That leads to Charlie not
only being calm during the meeting, but he very much not to fall
asleep. In the end Charlie can't fight it any longer and just falls
asleep in his chair as he is. Fulvio is enthusiastic and impressed
how Chrlie can go to sleep and just sleep peacefully.
Charlie and Fulvio become friends for real. That's
how Charlie realises that the mean mafia boss is just a show.
Fulvio's wish for life is to grow tomatos. He only plays the mean
mafia boss, because that's what everyone seems to expect him to be
like. So Fulvio is just one more person, who is unsatisfied and with
totally different dreams for how his own life should be. Charlie
decides to help him.
Charlie consults the beautiful Judy Tipp (Sandra
Bullock) about his digestive problems, who not only is able to help him
with alternative medicine about his bodily problems. He's also
infected by her optimism and the to of them come closer.
All in all this film can't be taken too serious and
is far from what might happen in real life. But the film has much
humour and it's much fun for me to watch all those great actors. The
characters were written which much love and care, even the smaller
parts and I enjoy it a great deal to see them all with their quirks
and their problems they are fighting with and do their best to stick
to their dreams and come closer to fulfilling them. At the end of
this turbulent adventure especially Charlie and Fulvio clearly
learned something for themselves and have been through quite some
changes and achieved things for themselves.
sarah
Labels:
comedy,
drama,
Liam Neeson,
M&M,
mental illness,
movie,
problems,
psychotherapy,
trouble
Wednesday, 29 January 2014
Everything used to be better in the old days?
Dear reader,
2003 was the year in which
our family-computer got an internet connection. We had a world of
options!
We created e-mail
addresses and suddenly we were writing much cheaper and faster
e-mails to long distant family and friends. Do you remember when you
wrote your last letter to someone all in handwriting? A letter, not a
postcard! My last handwritten letter to someone was last year. More
of a sort of accident, because I needed to send something for a new
ID card and had no printer. My last letter before that? No idea. How
about you?
How did you order presents
for last christmas? I bought exactly one present in a shop.
Everything else I ordered comfortably online over the internet.
Somewhat sad really.
Anyway, what did we do
without the internet in the earlier days? Read more, I suppose. In
november 2012 the german newspaper “Frankfurter Rundschau” filed
an application for bankruptcy at the court in Frankfurt on the Main.
The printing costs were too high compared with the number of sales.
Why buy a paper anyway, if you can read everything online for free?
In february 2013 it was announced that the paper will keep on going
still.
Maybe everything was
better in the old days. At least many of us didn't spend that much
time in front of a screen and went out with others more often. Are
computers a bad thing as such though? The world is changing, that's
just the way it is and cultures and people are changing. In the old
days there were only books in libraries. Now you can get CDs and DVDs
there as well. In the old days there were catalogues of libraries in
boxes and information on index cards on paper. Now everything is in
computers and you can search easily and fast. And you don't even have
to go to the library to find they don't have the book you're looking
for or you can't currently borrow it. We can check that online at
home. Contrary to the online shopping, which makes me somewhat sad,
although I do that, too, I quite like the online search in library
catalogues. Or maybe not. Because without it, at least I'd be outside
once... The computer doesn't, at least not for now, replace humans
totally. The work does change a bit with computers though. I also
don't yet see the danger of technological changes and inventions
endangering our work place as such. Machines taking over the world? I
don't think so. Because for that the machines (for now) have too
little of a life of their own and in the end it's up to us, the users
of the technology to decide if or how much and how to use it. Even
though some tv programs by now are thought to be rather low and
stupid by many people, I still trust the humans to not be controlled
by machines that much in a sense that in the end the machines control
the humans.
Or maybe they do? Because,
what's left in a time of a black out that disables our devices? Even
if in our desperation, we'd turn to our books, we'd need light for
that to read them. Although that should cause no problem with the
modern eBook-readers, even in a time of a black out. Or if you've got
enough lights in the house and a match or fire-lighter.
In 2012 an australian film
came out called Underground: The Julian Assange Story
telling the story of the youth of Julian Assange, the founder and
chief editor of WikiLeaks. There's a scene where the young Julian
sits in his room with his girlfriend. It's already dark outside. She
tells him of a place where she'd like to go and asks him, if he likes
to travel. He tells her that he already has. When he's hacking
computers, he travels all the time. Sitting here in his bedroom and
at the same time being at the other side of the world. Then he asks
her to look outside the window and pick a suburb. She does. Julian
types in a few lines on the computer and suddenly all the lights to
out in the suburb she told him. “Did you just do that?”, she asks
him. He doesn't reply, just tells her to pick another suburb. “No”,
she says. “All those poor people are in the dark.” “They are
happy”, he says. “Did you know that nine months after a black
out, there's always a rise in the number of child births?”
Finally the vision of the
“Factory of the Future” as Warren G. Bennis saw it:
The factory of the future
will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there
to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching
the equipment.
Until next
blog,
sarah
sarah
Standort:
Bochum, Deutschland
Friday, 17 January 2014
Three Questions
Dear reader,
I don't know, who came up with those questions originally. If someones can prove it, please leave a comment, I'd be grateful.
In any case, Craig Ferguson once said in a Comedy Central performance, that three questions are important before you speak... even more so before you write something on the internet, where it essencially stays there forever:
1. Does it have to be said?
2. Does it have to be said by me?
3. Does it have to be said by me now?
Here's a video clip of Craig Verguson's performance, or rather a preview of it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIdox3zpv-w
Until next blog,
sarah
I don't know, who came up with those questions originally. If someones can prove it, please leave a comment, I'd be grateful.
In any case, Craig Ferguson once said in a Comedy Central performance, that three questions are important before you speak... even more so before you write something on the internet, where it essencially stays there forever:
1. Does it have to be said?
2. Does it have to be said by me?
3. Does it have to be said by me now?
Here's a video clip of Craig Verguson's performance, or rather a preview of it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIdox3zpv-w
Until next blog,
sarah
Tuesday, 24 December 2013
M&M: Nightmare Before Christmas
Dear reader,
did you ever thought about
the holidays we celebrate? Easter, Valentines Day, Halloween,
Christmas? The animated film “Nightmare Before Christmas” by Tim
Burton is just about that!
Jack Skellington is a
skinny skeleton in a black-and-white striped suit and the head of
Halloween Town, who's people are responsible for Halloween. Jack is
sad. For a while now he didn't have fun scaring others and he wants
something else. Only he doesn't know what that might be. During a
walk he comes to another town: Christmas Town. Everything there is
snowy and has a wonderful scent and everybody has fun and is happy.
Also there's supposedly somebody huge and red and he brings presents.
Jack finds out that this somebody is called “Sandy Claws”.
Wonderful!
Jack wants this Christmas, too. He'll be preparing for the next one
himself. Three kids, usually out to collect sweets are send by Jack
to kidnap Sandy Claws so that Jack can do his job. Although Jack
specifically tells the kids not to bring Sandy Claws to Oogie Boogie,
that's exactly what they do. Oogie Boogie is the only really mean and
scary person in Halloween Town and ready to kill somebody just to be
entertained, that's especially true for this oh so great Sandy Claws.
Jack doesn't see any of
that coming and everybody is excited. Only Sally is very worried.
She's a bit like the Frankenstein monster stitched together and is
held captive by her creator, Doctor Finkelstein in his castle. She
likes Jack. Jack doesn't quite see that. In a vision she sees
Christmas go completely and utterly wrong, so she does everything she
can, to stop Jack's plan. Jack doesn't listen to her at all.
Christmas goes totally wrong and ends in Jack being shot down with
his flying sleigh. Only then does he realise how wrong he was,
although he had meant well. Sandy Claws has to come back! Will Jack
rescue him and with that Christmas in time? You've got to find out
for yourself!
Like many animated films
by Tim Burton, “Nightmare Before Christmas" has many songs and it's
a kind of musical. The music was written by his permanent partner,
the composer Danny Elfman. The latter also was the singing voice for
Jack Skellington. Although Danny Elfman does the singing for demos of
his songs, his voice is not heard in the films. That's what makes
“Nightmare Before Christmas” something special for fans. When I
saw the film for the first time, I didn't know Tim Burton as such, I
have to admit. I knew his films – in hindsight – but the name got
familiar for me only after “Nightmare Before Christmas”. I was
lucky to see that film when a professor at uni offered to show it to
those willing to come one afternoon before Christmas holidays. Being
handicapped myself, I was fascinated with Sally and her body parts
stitched together. One scene especially is just brilliant, when she
runs away from the castle of the doctor to see Jack. She jumps out of
the window. For a moment you almost believe she died from the jump.
She's lying there motionless on the ground. But then she moves and
stitches one of her arms tight to the rest again in a very resolute
way. It's gone loose from the jump.
Jack was a very special
character for Danny Elfman at the time the movie was made in 1993.
His music career started in about 1972 when he started in the music
group formed by his brother Richard Elfman. When Richard wanted to
quit, Danny took over the group and it was cut from 20 to just 8
people and went on to be a New Wave/Ska/Punk/Rock Band: Oingo Boingo.
They recorded their first album “Only A Lad” in 1980. According
to Danny Elfman he still doesn't get it why the young director Tim
Burton wanted him of all people to write the music for his first big
film “Pee Wee's Big Adventure” in 1985. That's how Danny Elfman
got into the film business. He got more and more famous as a film
music composer and then it became obvious to him that he couldn't go
on with Oingo Boing and composing for film at the same time. Both
together were just taking too much time and energy. But how to
choose? How should he go on? A very uncertain future for Jack
Skellington in the movie as well as Danny Elfman in real life. It was
this connection with Jack, not only through writing the lyrics and
music, but also on a personal level, which made Danny Elfman want to
sing the part of Jack Skellington himself – which he did in the
end.
Until next blog,
sarah
Labels:
Danny Elfman,
drama,
M&M,
movie,
Nightmare Before Christmas,
Tim Burton
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)