What the... hypnosis

Dear reader,

hypnosis is when someone is swinging a pocket watch back and forth in front of you, counting and telling you that at some point, you won't be able to keep your eyes open and sleep. That is at best how many think about stage-hypnosis.

This was supposed to be a post to introduce you to some hypnosis-people, especially hypnotherapists, meaning people, who use hypnosis for therapy, combined with a bit of history of hypnosis. That's what I had planned for February. As you can see, as a result I didn't write anything at all in February.

The truth is that I have barely any knowledge about the history of hypnosis. I have read two or three general books on hypnosis. Of course they had bits about the history and names of famous people of the past, thanks to YouTube I was able to watch interviews with hypnotists and hypnotherapists and see demonstrations or seminars. But apart from Dr. Milton Erickson, I hardly know more than the name of most people.

In addition to that I noticed during the past couple of months that I forgot now things I knew quite well, say half a year ago or so. Including terms I was able to explain or at least use without any problems back then. Am I getting old? Or am I becoming like Sherlock Holmes, who doesn't know that the earth goes around the sun, because it's irrelevant for his life?

Here comes what I'd like to share with you, for which I don't have to consult (my) books: my history of hypnosis. (Confession: I didn't use a book, but I did look up the dates on wikipedia.)

The name used very often as the sort of father of hypnosis or hypnotherapy is Franz Anton Mesmer (1734-1815). Years ago I liked the actor Alan Rickman a lot. I like him still today, but I'm not that much familiar with his more recent works now as I was years ago. In any case, he was in the movie “Mesmer” playing him in 1994. The frame story of the movie is a court hearing, which Mesmer has to go through. The treatment method of the doctor are so unconventional for his time that many thought he was a charlatan. That's why he was in court for. Later I read a couple of books about Mesmer to find out, what parts of the story in the movie had really happened. Without knowing it, this was my introduction to hypnosis, I guess. Although Mesmer didn't call what he did hypnosis. At first he worked with magnets. In one book I read that story that he was taking part in a sort of parade, when someone came up to him asking for help, because no other doctor was so close and available. He went and was lead to the ill person and only realised when he was there, that he had left the magnets in the coach at the parade. If lifeless stones and magnets were able to help, surely he, Mesmer, a warm living being full of energy, must be able to help with touch and strokes with his hands. Indeed he was able to help, so he didn't use the magnets anymore after that experience. He called what he did “animal magnetism”. Today it's also known as “mesmerism”. His name even became an adjective in English as “mesmerising” (to describe something as being fascinating or hypnotising).

Independently from Mesmer back then, also the Chinese medicine assumes an energy, known as chi or qi. Reiki is a method practised to this day, in which the hands are used to heal.

But Mesmer wasn't quite the beginning. Even the Egypts and Greeks knew sleep temples. Priests, who at that time were also functioning as doctors, healed a variety of illnesses through rites with putting the sick into a healing sleep.

The miracle healings of Jesus, his apostles and the early Christians came most likely often with hypnosis, too. Imposition of hands and fixation of the eyes (fixation) e. g. with a shining metal plate, are typical practices.

Another surgeon one should know is the Scotsman James Braid (1795-1860). He too studied magnetism and coined the term “neurypnology”, so still not “hypnosis” as a term. In Braid's time anaesthesia was still in its infancy. His book is called: Neurypnology; Or, the Rationale of Nervous Sleep Considered in Relation with Animal Magnetism.

James Esdaile (1808-1859) on the other hand reminds me a bit of Erickson. Esdaile had asthma and he moved from Great Britain to India in the hope that the climate there would be better for him. Erickson got vaccinated after a bike accident, but he got an anaphylactic shock from the vaccination, which nearly killed him and as a result he developed allergies. Therefore he moved to Phoenix, Arizona. Anyway, it shouldn't surprise you that Esdailes book title is: Mesmerism in India and Its Practical Application in Surgery and Medicine.

Another doctor, who should be mentioned is the psychiatrist and neurologist Hippolyte Bernheim (1840-1919), who studied the reactions to suggestions. Suggestions are also an important aspect with hypnosis and hypnotherapy. Consequently his form of therapy was the “suggestive therapy”, on which he wrote several books, for example: Suggestive Therapeutics: A Treatise on the Nature and Uses of Hypnotism.

By the way, the so called Russian miracle healer Rasputin (1869-1916) also used hypnosis to help especially the tsar son, when he had one of his bleedings again. I find it inappropriate, to call the treatments of the tsar son miracle healings though. Because Rasputin didn't heal him from hemophilia. He only stopped the immediate bleedings. More on Rasputin in another entry later.

Many people certainly don't know that Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) studied with the neurologist Jean-Martin Charco (1825-1893) and used hypnosis before he invented his psychoanalysis. Later he turned away from hypnosis. Surely in part to spend more time with his own ideas and psychoanalysis. I could also imagine that in part he also didn't like being close to clients and maybe even touch them, since one aspect with psychoanalysis is precisely that of keeping distance and interfering as little as possible.

If I had to write more detailed, I could write a book and would have to look up things more after all. For now this should be enough with the people mentioned to start with. Should hypnotists, hypnotherapists or hypnosis-enthusiasts read this post, I'd be happy to read your additional names and comments.

Until next blog,

sarah

M&M: Martian Child

Dear reader,

I know the title may sound a bit cheesy-stupid and this is supposed to be a story worth watching and being reviewed by me? Yes!

Martian Child tells the – as always in case of movies only partly – true story of the writer David Gerrold and the experiences of a small boy named Dennis, whom he decided to adopt. I'll first tell you a bit of the story as told in the movie and then of the book, which I have read, too.

David (played by John Cusack) is a science-fiction writer, who's books are also made into movies. Even before the movie starts, his wife has died. Now he's living alone with his dog. One day he gets the idea of maybe adopting a child. He wants somebody around again and wants to do something good. With so many children without a proper home, it only seems right to adopt a child. Even though his sister Liz (played by John Cusack's real life oder sister, Joan Cusack) explicitly warns him about that, “Listen, the thing about kids, and I wouldn't trade mine for the world, is that they keep comin' at you, all right? They're... they're like mosquitoes, suckin' the life out of you. They take away your life, your privacy, your identity...”

But David already has contacts to a children's home and they also have a possible special boy in mind for him. The special thing about Dennis (powerfully played by Bobby Coleman) is, that he's certain to be from mars. It takes a while for Dennis to build up contact to David. He is in a box turned upside down in the children's home all the time, to protect himself from the sunlight. During a ride with the car, Dennis likes the “holding-down belt”. It guarantees him to be staying on earth ant not float away, much like the weights he is constantly wearing around his ankles.

Of course you can't just adopt a child like that. There are doctors and other organisations, that want to check everything is ok and want to have talks. Especially since Dennis is a bit difficult what with his idea of being from mars and also he steals from other children and David's things, too. Those check-ups aren't always pre-announced.

Although Dennis is certainly somewhat unusual, he is nevertheless very charming and David is a very trying and sympathetic and patient father for him. Probably what safes them both is the fact that David, as a writer, just simply has the time to take care of Dennis and since he's working from home, he also isn't away as much as other single parents would naturally be. There are repeatedly very funny moments. My favourite quote from Dennis however is something he says to David during a baseball game. David tries to explain the game to him and what it means when the players are really good. Because then they are a superstar! To which Dennis says, in a stunningly matter-of-fact way, “Superstars don't exists. Only supernovas and white dwarfs.”

But one night, when David is on an event for his books, he comes home and his sister has to tell him that Dennis ran away unnoticed. And then there's the final talk with the authorities and Dennis to decide whether Dennis can actually stay with David. I will not tell you how those two very exciting moments are concluded. You'll have to see that for yourself, really. It's well worth it. There are a lot of funny moments, at least one really sad one as well and there's drama and excitement also. I enjoy watching that movie time and again. Especially how everything is developing between Dennis and David with both of them being very unsure and insecure and then coming together, I just like seeing that progress. This progress and the many different emotions that come up, at least inside me when I'm watchting that movie, makes it worth watching for me every time. The title really shouldn't keep you away from it!

I can't tell you about the movie extras in america, because I don't have that version. My european version at least also includes an interview with the “real” Dennis and David and also insight into how the movie was made. Especially hearing what it was it is like for Dennis and David now and what they think of the past and their time together at the beginning, is a nice extra for me. The german synchronisation is quite well done, by the way. With one exception, which I don't understand at all and frankly find outrageously done in the execution. It certainly could have been done a different way, I think. David's dog is called “Somewhere” in English. Which makes it a nice playing with words of a direction as well as a name when you say, “Somewhere a dog barked.” In the movie in german they called him “Once upon a time”. I think, “Irgendwo” (the german “somewhere”) would have worked, too. But maybe I'm just picky...

In “real life” the adoption was a bit more complicated. The authorities don't like a single parents adopting a child much anyway. The “real” David Gerrold however also is gay. Certainly nothing dramatic, but also not really exactly a plus in the eyes of the authorities either. All in all there are many moments from the film in the book and vice versa. I personally found the situation when Dennis runs away more dramatic and depicted more exciting in the movie. The situation in the book was a little bit different, and especially the reasons why Dennis ran away at that moment. In fact I found his motivation in the book even quite a bit more sad and dramatic, even though it is depicted in a more dangerous way in the movie. I've seen the movie first and only read the book afterwards. I don't know if it's because of that and because I had certain ideas in my head already. In any case, I liked the movie a bit more. The book seemed in some parts like it was cut and I wished that some moments would have gone on a bit longer, explained a bit more in how they went on. But instead came a new paragraph and a new experience. Nevertheless the book is worth reading, too.

Until next blog,

sarah

Limited perception

Dear reader,

we're looking at our watch daily. Whether it's a wrist watch or the mobile phone (cell phone for american readers). Do you have a wrist watch? If so, cover it up with your other hand to not look at it and answer a couple of questions:

- Can you tell me, if your watch is an analog one with the numbers 1 to 12 in a circle or is it digital?
- If it's analog: does it have roman numbers or arabic ones (like this number: 2) or lines where the numbers should be? Does it have a way of showing you the seconds in some way? If so how? Does your watch also have a section for the date?
- If your watch is digital: does it have arabic numbers like on a clock face that just jump to the next number? Or is it a typical digital way with lines forming the numbers? Does it show the date?

For those among you, who already don't have a wrist watch: does your mobile/cell have numbers to show the time or the lines that form the numbers? Does your phone show you the seconds? If so how?

Now take your hand off your wrist watch or take your phone and check, if your answers were correct.

Please cover your watch or phone for one last time, so you can't see the display.

You just had a look at your watch or phone. So clearly you can tell me what time it is for you right now? If it's any comfort to you: most people will not be able to answer that question. Because our perception is always limited. When you looked at the watch the first time, it was to see if you answered the questions correctly. The time display was irrelevant for you. So you didn't pay attention to it.

It's similar to the following, probably already familiar, video. The instruction is to count how many times the players with the white t-shirts passed the ball:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGQmdoK_ZfY 

Until next blog,


sarah

M&M: How the Grinch Stole Christmas

Dear Reader,

my mother didn't like the actor Jim Carrey much. He was grimassing too much for her liking. But one day our half american friends once borrowed us their only english dvd of “How the Grinch Stole Christmas”. Jim Carrey is hidden behind a hairy green mask in that one. My mother understood english well, but it wasn't quite good enough for the details of the film. She borrowed the german dvd from the library a couple of days later. The story was compelling enough for her and Jim Carrey hidden enough, that she found it well worth watching a second time.

But what's the story about anyway? The film from the year 2000 tells the christmassy story, based on a story by Dr. Seuss. In english speaking areas Dr. Seuss is well known for writing stories for children in rhymes. As already in Nightmare Before Christmas, this story too is about an unhappy outsider. Though with the Grinch we've got someone who hates christmas as much as one can hate a celebration. He lives up north from Whoville, a small town, in which all inhabitants just love christmas like no other celebration. Cindy Lou Who (Taylor Momsn) is the young daughter of the post officer Lou Lou Who (Bill Irwin). She is a bright, curious girl and when she finds out that the Grinch never sends, nor gets post, she goes to find out why. It's because of her insistence, too, that during the party before christmas, the Grinch should be the cheermeister of the party. Because the book says, “The cheermeister is the one who deserves a back slap or a toast. And it goes to the soul at Christmas who needs it most.” Not that the Grinch would agree, that he needed christmas the most... But Cindy Lou goes to him up on the mountain and invites him. The Grinch thinks hard back and forth and eventually goes. Gritting his teeth, he makes it through all the festivities.


And then... then comes the night. The Grinch is up on his mountain and sees how Santa Claus with his sleigh and reindeers is bringing the presents to everyone. So he sets out and makes himself a christmas costume and his loyal dog Max is converted to a reindeer for the sleigh. Then the Grinch sneaks down to the town and steals all the presents to destroy them in the dump. When he gets to Cindy Lou's house, she's just awake, too. He hides behind the christmas tree, which he was just about to steal. When she asks him what christmas is really about, he simply tells her, “Vengeance!” only to correct himself quickly with, “I mean... presents... I suppose.”

In the early hours the first couple of people realise that the presents are gone. But the inhabitants of Whoville are flexible and find that christmas isn't really about presents anyway, but being with your beloved family. So they sing and are happy after all. The Grinch hears that and realises for the first time, that he, too, can change. What that change looks like and what the Grinch does with that, you'll have to find out for yourself. I also won't tell you, why the Grinch is living so alone on the mountain in the first place. That's a story you'll have to find out together with Cindy Lou.

By the way Jim Carrey's mask was really good According to a trivia entry on imdb.com to that movie, the latex skin was so confining and uncomfortable for him, that he needed counselling from Navy SEAL who taught him torture-resistance techniques.

It's interesting how in certain kind of movies, the bad guys come across as very sympathetic somehow. The Grinch is one of those. With his deep seated hate, he is certainly entertaining and is different from the often only cheesy christmas stories.

Until next blog,

sarah

Drug of choice

Dear reader,

a treat for you for new year's eve, although most of you probably won't read it in time and/or won't have time to prepare yourself accordingly before the party. Anyway... 

Drug of choice is something Richard Bandler came up with. The idea is that our body remembers sensations and reactions. Mind you, it's not the drugs that cause you to feel a certain way and experience the world in a certain way. It's your body's response to the drugs that does that. So for example it's not the LSD that makes you feel the way you feel, it's your body's response to the LSD.

Of course with the technique's name "drug of choice" we tend to think of drugs: LSD, or alcohol most commonly, I guess. But it can also be used to help you sleep without your sleeping pills. According to Richard Bandler, you have to take this pill or whatever once and remember it and if you do the remembering well enough, taking the thing once is enough and you can recreate the sensations again as much and as often as you like and need to. I remember Bandler talking about having several teeth removed and he needed to take some kind of meds. He supposedly took them only once and did it with "drug of choice" the next times. The good thing about "drug of choice" is that with alcohol for example, you don't get the negative side- or after-effects like hangover, headache and such. Essentially "drug of choice" means: free drugs as much as you want!

So how do you do this? Let's say you want to get drunk. You remember a past time when you were drunk or drinking anyway. Where's the first location you felt it in your body? I assume it was your mouth. What kind of feeling was it? Maybe a cooling sensation in your mouth. Where did you feel something next? And what kind of sensation? Just as suggestions: your throat? Stomach? What about your hands? Your legs? How about your head? Just go through your body, remember all the parts of your body in the order you feel the effects when you are drinking alcohol. Got them all? Go through them again. As always, do it in the order they happen for you. Do this a couple of times and you'd most likely be drunk quite soon. You may want to make sure you're sitting down somewhere the first time or times you do this. And watch out when you stand up again!

You could also create an anchor for being drunk. That way you may get there faster the next time and you don't always have to sit down going through all the parts of your body time and again.

There's a nice video of the magician Derren Brown doing this with a guy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zryGzTbU49I

Derren is quite sneaky with his anchor on the poor chap sending him a short message at an unexpected time. Watch out for the guy with the turban, who's sitting in front of the guy. That's Derren. He's in his costume/disguise from another trick he did prior to this in that show. So it's not like Derren just sends him messages and leaves him alone drunk. Very responsible man, he is.

And also another video working with anchors to enhance the intensity here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsqZYezp_38

The basic idea of this is that you had the sensations before and remember them in a certain order. But others suggested that you don't need to have been drunk in order to make yourself drunk that way. We all have seen drunk people either in real life or on movies. So we have a reference, if not our own. Some say that this is enough already. I haven't tested that yet.

You may also want to take it further than just getting rid of your sleeping pills. They only gave me one once or twice on a night before surgery. But I don't usually take them and wouldn't do it again ever given my experiences and knowledge about hypnosis now. Certainly they gave me some stuff to calm me down before surgeries. You may want to recreate those sensations, too, if you aren't used to sleeping pills. I'm sure you'll go to sleep very soon that way. Even if you don't take sleeping pills. I know I could drift off quite easily that way if I wanted to. However for sleeping problems I usually do something less "dramatic", but equally effective, as I wrote in other posts before.

You could substitute sleeping pills, if you take them on a regular basis and don't want that anymore. Ideally you shouldn't need sleeping pills on a regular basis anyway. Certainly you can get hypnotically drunk with this method, too. How about replacing pills that help you with sexual dysfunctions of some kind with this method? How about if you have a weight problem and make up your own drug with “drug of choice” to help you with that? Or a confidence booster for shy people? Or... post your ideas to use this method in the comments. (Also see my Long live placebo post for that, if you haven't already read it.)

You could also combine effects or effects of different substances and make your own new free drug! It's  free, no negative side-effects, no after-effects. And you can have it as often and as long as you want. I have this naïve idea that people teach this method to addicts and the drug-related crimes and deaths go down and drug taking goes down. But maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part. I haven't worked with addicts, I don't really know about addictions. Would be cool if it worked though.

Please be careful, if you want to use this method to replace actual medication you really need. Like a diabetic who needs regular insulin shots for example. At least consult your doctor about this before. There are some pharmaceuticals you should actually take and not replace them like that. Not without consulting a doctor first anyway.

Until next blog,
sarah

Heavenly music

Dear reader,

I rarely hear "pure" classical music. I do listen to a lot of soundtracks. Soundtracks speak to more, because good soundtracks tell a story of their own even without the pictures.

Year ago, I became again interested in magic and found Derren Brown. In his stage show "Something Wicked This Way Comes", the second act starts with him getting a woman from the audience on stage, sitting her across from him at a table, signing a brick of wood for her and then hammering a nail in his nose, well the nose hole. To finish, he hammers the nail in the brick (perfectly timed with the playing music) and hands the brick to her as a present. All of that is with almost no words, he only whispers when she should hold the nail and when he asks for her name to sign the brick for her. This is accompanied by Beethoven's fifth piano concerto, in english areas also known as "The Emperor". It is a strange thing to see someone hammering a nail in the nose, although I'm well aware that this act is not a trick, but really possible. Those of you, who can't see that sort of thing, should just click on the video to start it and look away or close your eyes. Everyone else can, of course, also close your eyes and just enjoy the music. The piece itself is the second of three and about 9 minutes long. Those of you who want to listen to the whole piano concerto and haven't yet, be warned: the transition from the second to the third part is very instant and very loud.

The second part is, not least because of Derren Brown, my favourite part. Although it doesn't hurt trained people to hammer a nail in the nose, it still has become the essence of relaxation and especially analgesia for me.

You have been warned, Derren Brown hammers a nail in his nose in this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNbnuZR2wd4

I heard the second, in my opinion divine, piece, in the movie "Master & Commander". A crew is sailing around on a ship. The captain enjoys playing the violin and the doctor plays the cello. Preferably, and much to the dislike of the rest of the crew, they play classical pieces. This is why there are at least some excerpts f those classical pieces on the CD of the soundtrack, too. An ingenious movie with the combination classical pieces with the captain and the doctor, by the way. Normally the two of them play always together. So all pieces are for violin and cello. The only exception is when they stop at the galapagos islands, to treat the injured doctor and give him a rest. On the island, on land and among many interesting new animals, he is in his element. That's the only moment, when you can hear a piece for solo cello, namely Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major, BWV 1007.

My favourite piece however can be heard when they sadly have to abandon a sailor, a cut version (of about 16 minutes cut down to about 5 minutes) of "Fantasia on a theme by Thomas Tallis" by Ralph Vaughun Williams. It's a bit complicated, I know. Thomas Tallis lived about 1500 until 1580-ish and has composed a hymn. Vaughun Williams was born about 1890-ish and died in 1960-ish. He was very interested in english folk songs and was inspired by Tallis' hymn. Vaughun Williams composed his wonderful piece in 1910, in which it was also performed for the first time in the Gloucester Cathedral. The special thing about it is, that the musicians are not all sitting together. some of them are sitting in a smaller ensemble somewhat apart. Vaughun Williams did that for the sound effect. In the link, which I'll give you in a bit, which by the way is also Gloucester Cathedral, the group is sitting, like they were in the premiere, so the spacial arrangement can be seen. I find it unbelievably exciting to hear the high strings at the beginning playing their melody and the low strings replying with the strings being plucked. The strings need quite some time, until they find to each other and really play together.

I'm not a music theorist. Others could tell much more about that piece. If you're interested, you'll certainly read up about it. I was lucky and found a very insightful audio sort of documentarydiscussion on the internet. It is about 45 minutes long. Let me know, if you want to listen to it. This should be it with explanations today.

Here it is now, the heavenly "Fantasia on a theme by Thomas Tallis" by Ralph Vaughun Williams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihx5LCF1yJY

With this I wish you all a heavenly christmas!

If you like, you can post your own favourite classical music in the comments,

Until next blog,
sarah

Finding interactive: your turn

Dear reader,

I already wrote about what I did once to find my glasses.

After the 11th Doctor had to say good-bye to Amy and Rory and seeing and losing Clara twice, he's sitting depressed on a swing when a little girl comes to sit next to him. Of course she notices that he's sad. She tells him what she's doing when she lost something:

"When I lost something I go to a quiet place and I close my eyes and then I can remember where I put it."

The Doctor agrees that this is a good plan.

A girl cannot seriously help a Time Lord to find something he lost, you might think. But this girl is qualified all right, because "I am always losing things. I lost my best pencil, my school bag, my gran and my mojo."

Here's the whole clip, about 2 1/2 minutes with the Doctor on the swing, english subtitles available, too:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRsCh4dYURA

And you? What do you do when you lost something (or someone?)?

Until next blog,
sarah